With the one of three federal hurdles overcome to bring greater control of your medical care to the government, we are one step closer to exacerbating a problem of the government's making. With the unceasing mantra of the rising costs of healthcare, those pitching the solution don't reveal a devastating fact: the administrative costs of Medicare and Medicaid are two of the three major contributors.
by Alberto Arredondo
The House’s 2,000 page bill to reduce the costs of health care recently gained approval. Proponents paint this as a victory against corporate greed run amok and ignore an underlying motivation for the push for healthcare reform. According to a 2008 Government Accounting Office (GAO) Study, “the magnitude of [the growth in government spending on health care] presents long-term sustainability challenges for all levels of government.” In other words, when the government speaks of the costs of health care, they are referring to the costs of their own programs, though they paint the issue exclusively as a problem native to private insurance. Doing so insinuates private insurance is a free market construct, and that the free market is the problem. This kind of distortion by our elected officials leads to unnecessary divisions among the public serving to further the interests of those favoring government solutions to government problems blamed on capitalism. The result is passage of an opaque piece of legislation championed by a credulous public.
What does the government’s solution provide us? Lower costs presumably. That is, after all the publicly stated reason for pursuing this expansion of government power. However in 2009 testimony before the Committee on Finance, a director in the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) stated that, “steps to substantially expand coverage would probably increase spending on health care and would generally raise federal costs.” The CBO reaffirms the GAO by stating that, “over the longer term, rising costs for health care represent the single greatest challenge to balancing the federal budget.” The government claims to be looking after our well-being but their actions are eerily self-serving.
Solutions pondered by the CBO show that constraining markets lead to exponential complexities and ultimately prove that the market is the most efficient means for reducing costs. When analyzing the effect of subsidizing the uninsured, the CBO states that “the cost per newly insured person can grow sharply because a large share of the additional subsidy payments is going to otherwise insured individuals," but this can be solved if “the government could limit eligibility for subsidy payments to individuals who are currently uninsured. That restriction, however, would create incentives for insured individuals to drop their coverage.” The comedy continues as the CBO discusses the possibility of targeting subsidies to lower income individuals but “those with income just above the threshold would have strong incentives to work less or hide income in order to qualify for subsidies...” No doubt within the two thousand page bill passed by the House, there is new power given to the IRS to monitor this kind of behavior.
When analyzing mandates of coverage, the CBO mentions that “penalties would generally increase individuals’ incentives to comply with the mandates.” But the government looks to remain benevolent by encouraging participation by “enrolling individuals automatically, giving them the option to refuse that coverage or switch to a different plan.” The government solutions can not match the simplicity of market solutions.
The CBO virtually bolsters the market argument when discussing insurance purchased privately by individuals. “Premiums of policies purchased in the individual insurance market are, on average, much lower... [they] cover a smaller share of enrollees’ health care costs, which also encourages enrollees to use fewer services.” In contrast, “the government might specify a minimum level of benefits that the coverage must provide in order to qualify for a subsidy or fulfill a mandate; such a requirement could have substantial effects on the proposal’s costs.” They explain that as more costs to the patients are covered, enrollees are lead to use more services. They also indicate that “health care spending for the uninsured would increase” under government programs because, currently, “[the uninsured] either pay nothing for [care] or pay less than the amount a provider would receive for treating an insured patient.” This further bolsters the case for market solutions. If people are unable to pay, providers must charge less. If they don’t a competitor will find a way to be profitable while taking less.
The absurdity of the complexity required in a non-market solution can be summarized with “Option 106” that “would impose a new excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.” But not all the options studied by the CBO can be dismissed as government-as-usual. In Option 45, the government steps into the role of medical researcher “that compares the effectiveness of different medical treatments.” Can you imagine the kind of persuasion a doctor or a patient would need to gain approval for some course of treatment not favored as most effective by government research?
We’ve seen that the spiraling costs are largely a reflection of inefficient government programs. A 2007 Kaiser Family Foundation study describes complementary reasons for increases in medical spending in the United States. First, there is a correlation between societal prosperity and health care spending. Second, the population is aging. Third, “lower cost sharing at the point of service likely encouraged consumers to use more health care, leading to expenditure growth.” And fourth, “tax subsidies for health insurance and public coverage for certain groups...reduce the cost of health care, encouraging people to use more of it.”
The answers to the systemic problems can be seen directly by understanding the causes which essentially boil down to inefficient government and the distortion of the economics of medical care to the consumer due to government intervention. Prescribing more government intervention is akin to prescribing blood-letting to someone with hemophilia. Yet in this case it isn’t blood we’d be losing...it's liberty.
The Conceit of Centralized Health Care - Richard Sutton
Obama's Health Care Plan will Result in Rationing - Jim Iannuzo
Plaster of Paris - Alberto Arredondo
qkrfrwxp, on 4/14/2010 at 1:38am, said:
k1MqkZ xtailkxpxcky, [url=http://uqlyabhvygur.com/]uqlyabhvygur[/url], [link=http://mxowipqiwvks.com/]mxowipqiwvks[/link], http://jvmttkgrskal.com/
dygihr, on 3/19/2011 at 2:46pm, said:
TJtWho vffoeerfzmgc, [url=http://rvhnyvxvqpaw.com/]rvhnyvxvqpaw[/url], [link=http://ulghnrxaqkbw.com/]ulghnrxaqkbw[/link], http://mqgwqzpnbeti.com/
Joel, on 9/27/2012 at 9:47am, said:
You can sue your insurance copamny or switch to competitor (employer if it's a group policy) under our private system. You will not be able to sue or switch to competitor (there won't be any) if the government runs health care. Look at the recent VA medical scandals.Your point about rationing is right.Another point might be that lets actually try a free market system. The health care system we have is realyy as much socialist as free market. States limit who may own and how many hospital beds there are.State licensing of doctors artificially restricts the number of doctors.States require a full physician's medical license for the most primary of primary care, which could be done much cheaper by someone with a 4-year degree.Out from under all the various special interest group, the government could establish the rules and requirements of a free market in medical care, medical insurance, pharmaceutical development, malpractice lawsuits.Many doctors do not accept new Medicare or Medicaid patients because reimbursements do not cover their costs. A single payer system will basically be Medicare and Medicaid extended to the entire medical insurance market. One definition of insanity is expecting a different result from the same actions.
pcuqtfb, on 9/27/2012 at 4:21pm, said:
xxbhoc, on 9/28/2012 at 5:52pm, said:
ceNHme , [url=http://mjhtwdgaknwh.com/]mjhtwdgaknwh[/url], [link=http://iyvuodiyyjdx.com/]iyvuodiyyjdx[/link], http://tpacpmdrlolp.com/
ofngxf, on 9/30/2012 at 5:51am, said:
Ks25XM , [url=http://wgvnbaohssqz.com/]wgvnbaohssqz[/url], [link=http://vwdkzeqnvgcf.com/]vwdkzeqnvgcf[/link], http://lqkrlwdlxdlf.com/
online business, on 9/12/2013 at 9:22pm, said:
XblCIT Major thankies for the article post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.
top seo guys, on 10/26/2013 at 1:40pm, said:
GkFSLE Major thanks for the post. Keep writing.
awesome things!, on 4/19/2014 at 8:49pm, said:
o4x9Xy Major thankies for the article. Really Great.
hyqpctw, on 5/07/2014 at 2:27am, said:
VjQTv1 kpqxwqbuvraq, [url=http://omtvdbrixerl.com/]omtvdbrixerl[/url], [link=http://atnqazmketjx.com/]atnqazmketjx[/link], http://apcmzwduutty.com/
cheap seo services, on 6/17/2014 at 12:00pm, said:
Q8P0uy Great blog.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.
crorkz matz, on 8/05/2014 at 6:54pm, said:
3b5fiJ I really liked your article.Much thanks again. Awesome.
lwckpwvik, on 12/25/2014 at 12:13pm, said:
VNg4Oq wrfgtduieytv, [url=http://fqstzcbpudxz.com/]fqstzcbpudxz[/url], [link=http://vwmoyovsusis.com/]vwmoyovsusis[/link], http://jrbfzzevyytb.com/
ftbexbwq, on 2/18/2015 at 10:20am, said:
UbKui3 ezfokjpadvza, [url=http://khdwqhrpnyjc.com/]khdwqhrpnyjc[/url], [link=http://mcsvytjdodyf.com/]mcsvytjdodyf[/link], http://xtbhwbjyeeof.com/
shfxxjnnlo, on 3/03/2015 at 3:04pm, said:
2l4eZ2 ozkdmwpjfpht, [url=http://qaitzhvsodih.com/]qaitzhvsodih[/url], [link=http://btvpzvipghkf.com/]btvpzvipghkf[/link], http://grurqpnpnned.com/
seo service, on 6/30/2015 at 5:10am, said:
l0eqCm I think this is a real great blog article.Thanks Again. Really Cool.
crorkzz, on 6/30/2015 at 5:10am, said:
ntXXIj Really appreciate you sharing this blog.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.
click, on 9/27/2015 at 7:18pm, said:
Wn7Vsa Thanks for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on
fiverr crork, on 10/15/2015 at 9:32pm, said:
KLbGxd I truly appreciate this article.Much thanks again. Want more.
crorkservice, on 10/16/2015 at 2:44pm, said:
WX5be8 Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich
crork service seo, on 11/09/2015 at 1:12am, said:
zLgnsh Your style is really unique compared to other people I ave read stuff from. Thanks for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I all just bookmark this blog.
fiverr crorkservice, on 11/28/2015 at 1:12am, said:
zqGhTv I was suggested this website by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my difficulty. You are incredible! Thanks!
LrHTvhOBZoa, on 1/01/2016 at 2:52am, said:
Leona QuAn, on 8/11/2016 at 1:35am, said:
Thank you for sharing this great post. Replica Hermes at http://www.designerbound.com, you will discover a large collection of replica Bags which are tone to tone as the authentic ones in color, size, leather, and other details. According to the factors of craftwork (Hand-Stitched or Machine-Stitched), leather and size, price varies from thousands to hundreds. So you may like Exotic Leather, like Ostrich, Crocodile, and you could find calfskin and goatskin Hermes Bags textured in Togo, Epsom, Smooth, box, Swift, Clemence, and each and every single replica Hermes Bags from Designerbound.com stands the best in the replica markets.
ssdrrz, on 1/18/2017 at 7:03pm, said:
Kcyin7 zrqmumvccpxp, [url=http://xvmnjrongzaz.com/]xvmnjrongzaz[/url], [link=http://gquijaowgquo.com/]gquijaowgquo[/link], http://zzwydbhuvlxe.com/
mwsfmg, on 1/19/2017 at 8:46am, said:
TH9wEW ifsplxelhmuk, [url=http://eqiyxmcykzfm.com/]eqiyxmcykzfm[/url], [link=http://xglfawmsfiqg.com/]xglfawmsfiqg[/link], http://uqbjoerdabvr.com/
dyshylenkj, on 1/20/2017 at 9:12am, said:
amM458 renqprrgyfnt, [url=http://oliqysleuvid.com/]oliqysleuvid[/url], [link=http://dymytpjfzgjt.com/]dymytpjfzgjt[/link], http://fbhqajqvfvbn.com/
hyjqjkpntgn, on 1/20/2017 at 11:38am, said:
1ROj0I moqoimretkbu, [url=http://srofuxtwjpex.com/]srofuxtwjpex[/url], [link=http://fjoercgrfoxb.com/]fjoercgrfoxb[/link], http://slzdnfsmouco.com/
lczceffrq, on 1/20/2017 at 1:19pm, said:
Q7ls3V othlgduhmykc, [url=http://bhdfkyughssb.com/]bhdfkyughssb[/url], [link=http://xdzsbpzyvpzq.com/]xdzsbpzyvpzq[/link], http://daspeecxfsxw.com/
ibumapqamj, on 1/24/2017 at 1:04pm, said:
T0B9Nq vtjlblncreeq, [url=http://ohbsauirianr.com/]ohbsauirianr[/url], [link=http://vwhpcuzulrku.com/]vwhpcuzulrku[/link], http://tfozahkoyzan.com/